afdave honesty check: 2007/12/30 [day 13 - honest days so far 0]
In “Baumgardner’s needs to explain burrows” thread afdave has this response to oximudd/jim:
“Hi Jim– Links from Faid don’t cut it. If you are going to disagree with a 2005 study that says that burrowers are poorly studied, you need to demonstrate that they are NOT poorly studied. A good starting point would be a single study about deep sea burrowers and their burrowing habits. Let’s take 1 at a time, OK? Over to you.“
- Does afdave admit to ignoring links Faid provided as evidence? Yes
- Does afdave give a good (or any) reason why these links are not valid evidence? No
- Does afdave answer any of the following points raised by oximudd/jim? No
- Need for YEC proponents to explain how animal burrows exist throughout the geological column when YEC propose that the column was deposited in the great flood at hundreds of feet per day.
- Why afdave believes it is ok to disregard Glenn Morton’s identification of burrows even though Glenn is a professional geologist and afdave has no practical experience in geology.
- Why afdave continues to ignore links provided by Faid.
Failed to be honest today.
Dishonest tactic: cowardly avoidance + ignoring evidence he doesn’t like